Curricular Planning Update, October 24, 2018

Curricular Deadlines

Monday, 11:59 pm Oct 29:  Dean’s deadline for Course Consent approval  (Dean will establish deadline for college curriculum committee to submit to dean)  

Wednesday, Oct 31: College Curriculum Committee deadline to forward approved program revision proposals to Dean’s office.

Wednesday, Nov. 7: Deadline for deans to transmit revisions to degree programs and minors to the Provost.  In extenuating circumstances, the college curriculum chair may request an extension through Wednesday, November 14th.  Only requests submitted by college curriculum chair, dean, or associate dean will be considered. Requests for extensions should be transmitted to the Provost’s Office no later than October 31st, via the Program Revisions Extension Request Google Form. The Provost’s Office will take evidence of a good-faith effort to meet the original deadline as the primary criterion for granting one-week extensions.

Friday, Nov 30: Deadline for URCC and GECC to transmit courses to SCCC.

Wed Dec 5th: Deadline for SCCC review of courses and transmittal to Provost’s office.  

Wed Dec 16th:  Deadline for SCCC to review all revisions to degree programs.

Existing GE Courses with Prerequisites Submitted to Course Consent and No Changes to Prerequisites

Existing GE courses with existing prerequisites, but propose no changes to course prerequisites in the course consent cycle for the fall 2019 catalog, (e.g. GE course that has a prerequisite but there is no change in prerequisite; course is in consent for another reason such as edits to the course description) do NOT need to submit additional documentation this year, because they will go through full recertification in the future. At the time of recertification, adherence to the CSUMB guidance on GE prerequisites will be required of all courses under review for recertification.

Existing GE Courses Submitted to Course Consent Changing or Adding Prerequisites or Greater than 3 Units

Existing GE courses that are in course consent to change or add prerequisites, or that are greater than 3 units should justify the exception in the “‘Describe your proposal.” section in accordance with the Senate guidelines on GE courses exceeding 3 units  or the guidelines on prerequisites  Upper-division courses that require a specific A1, A2, A3, B4 course, would need to provide justification for why only a specific course is acceptable as a prerequisite.

Courses requesting new GE certification that are greater than 3 units or that have prerequisites other than those allowed in the Senate guidelines on prerequisites and credits

Courses requesting new GE certification that are greater than 3 units or that have prerequisites other than those allowed in the Senate guidelines on prerequisites and units must provide justification for these exceptions in the “‘Describe your proposal” section.  This includes upper-division GE courses that require a specific A1, A2, A3, B4 course. Justifications should comply with the Senate guidelines on GE courses exceeding 3 units  or the guidelines on prerequisites.

Anticipating the November ASCSU Plenary

8 October 2018 report

Celebrating CSU Community Engagement & Service Learning Centers

At the upcoming November Plenary, The Senate is scheduled to take action on the Resolution Observing the 20th Anniversary of the CSU Centers for Community Engagement and Student Success in Service Learning and Community Engagement. This is a quite brief resolutions and the key elements are that the ASCSU encourages both the Chancellor, Board of Trustees, every campus Senate and campus President to “plan for and carry out an appropriate observation of the 20th anniversary of the CSU Center for Community Engagement.” (Also mentioned in the 10 September Report on the Senate blog).

If you have questions, feedback, or comments on the resolution, please be in contact with Vanessa or Scott.

 

ASCSU Action on Shared Governance

Also at the November Plenary, the Senate is scheduled to take action on the Tenets of System Level Governance in the California State University. This document is the outcome of intensive discussions  between the ASCSU Executive team and the Chancellor’s Office and it outlines baseline tenets regarding how shared governance between the ASCSU and the Chancellor’s Offices should occur. These discussions and the resulting Tenets document represent ASCSU’s effort to call the Chancellor’s Office to account for breakdown in appropriate consultation around implementation of EO1100/1110. (Also mentioned in the 10 September Report on the Senate blog).

Since the Tenets documents itself represents an agreed-upon commitment by both the ASCSU Executive team and the Chancellor’s Office, it is unlikely the Tenets document itself will be modified. However, it is likely that the Tenets will be accompanied by a resolution, which can provide further commentary on behalf of the Senate.

If you have questions, feedback, or comments on the resolution, please be in contact with Vanessa or Scott.

 

CSU Faculty needed for Five-Year Review of Transfer Courses

The C-ID (Course Identification System) group is looking for CSU faculty to participate in the Five-Year Review process.  This review process both approves courses and ensures proper descriptors for system-wide Community College courses that transfer to the CSU. There is often a shortage of CSU faculty participating in the review process, even though their expertise is greatly needed.

Currently, C-ID initiated the 5-Year Review of the TMC and descriptors for Biology, Chemistry, and Agriculture in fall 2017 and remains in need of additional CSU faculty feedback for the following disciplines:

Agriculture Animal Science, Agriculture Business, Agriculture Plant Science, Agriculture Descriptors

Further, C-ID is initiating the 5-year review of the descriptors and transfer model curriculum (TMC) for six disciplines during the fall 2018 term, and is now seeking input to determine whether or not changes are warranted and, if so, what those changes should be. The information gathered from the surveys will be reviewed by the FDRG for each discipline and used to guide the 5-year review process.

Links to the 5-year surveys are accessible below. The deadline for feedback is October 25, 2018:

Accounting (descriptors only)

Communications Studies

Economics

Film, Television, and Electronic Media

Nutrition and Dietetics

Psychology

If you are interested in participating or would like more information regarding these roles, please send an email to support@c-id.net.

Curricular Planning Update, September 29, 2018

There were a number of issues and situations addressed in by curricular committees on Friday, September 28, 2018.

Minor Changes for UR Courses in the Administrative Update Master Course List

Courses that meet a UR requirement through the administrative update do not have to submit additional documentation if they are changing up to 2 units, and/or changing corequisites or prerequisites. These courses still must be submitted through Course Consent.

This means if a department or school would like to make a minor change to a UR course listed in the Administrative Update Master Course List, they would:

  1. Submit the course in Course Consent.
  2. Indicate the changes, which are
    • up to 2 units and/or
    • corequisites or prerequisites.
  3. No other documentation is required, e.g., a course syllabus or proposal form.

GE courses Exceeding 3 Units

In exceptional cases when a GE course also fulfills an MLO, requests can be made for an exemption from the 3-unit criterion with a written rationale based on the following:

  1. Academic necessity in relation to the MLO as demonstrated by common practice at other institutions
  2. Degree completion efficiency
  3. For Lower Division GE courses, document the consistency with the CA Community College system

Prerequisites for GE Courses

Based on EO 1100 and recommendations by the GECC, the Provost’s office has approved  prerequisites for GE courses in the following cases:

Lower-Division

Prerequisites for lower-division GE courses are assumed to be met by high school a-g coursework and admission to the CSU except for sequenced Area B courses, language courses, and placement tests. For sequenced courses, the first course in a sequence should not have additional prerequisites. Petitions for exceptions may be considered by the GE Curriculum Committee.

Upper-Division

Prerequisites for upper-division GE courses are the Golden Four (A1, A2, A3, and B4). Other prerequisites must be reflective of the skills and abilities beyond the Golden Four necessary for the course.  In such cases, a prerequisite for an upper division GE course is assumed to be to be a GE-certified course.

As a reminder, Monday October 1, 11:59 pm is the department deadline for Course Consent entry. Courses should be forwarded from department to college curriculum committee by this date, although edits can be made by colleges after this date (or items can be returned to submitter for corrections), no additional courses can be added to the queue after October 1.

Thanks,
Michael

Curricular Planning Update, September 25, 2018

This update is to let you know the Administrative Update Master Course List has been published. A permanent link has been included in the GE and UR Interim Learning Outcomes and Criteria Master. This faculty recommended course list includes the Administrative Update Process for GE Units and UR Tags approved in Spring 2018, and the more recent  Administrative Update for Ethnic Studies and the Upper Division Area D Administrative Update for former D4 courses that were already 3 or 4 units. These course lists were recommended by the appropriate curricular committees, the SCCC, and approved by the Provost’s office through Spring 2020. The courses in the master list can be used by degree programs to modify their curriculum and develop pathways in the new curricular model approved last spring.

I also want to point you to the FAQ on the Revisions to EO 1100 Revised August 23, 2017 published by the Chancellor’s Office. In particular, FAQ 7 (Page 2), which explains the organization of the 48 units of GE. This organization includes 39 units of lower-division GE and the remaining 9 units upper-division, 3 units in each of the areas B, C, and D.

There will likely be more updates this week. For example, we are working on a curricular FAQ to help address curricular issues as we resolve them.

Thanks,
Michael

Curricular Planning Update, September 21, 2018

Now that Course Consent is back online, here is another curricular update.

All course proposal forms are now available including GE Area C, UDSL, and WCL on the GE and UR Interim Learning Outcomes and Criteria Master .

Upper Division Service Learning (UDSL) will use the previous D4 outcomes for this Course Consent cycle. The UDSL course proposal form has been updated accordingly. If you are submitting a UDSL course, please contact Deb Burke, if you haven’t already.

World Culture/Language (WCL) have been formally approved by the URCC and SCCC. The criteria were revised and the WCL course proposal form has been updated. If you are submitting a WCL course, please contact Yoshiko Saito-Abbott, if you haven’t already.

Colleges, schools, divisions, and departments are doing the final vetting of the Ethnic Studies Administrative Update and the Upper Division D UDSL Administrative Update. This process will be completed by the end of business today. A list of all administratively updated courses will be made available to the campus early next week so programs can start aligning their pathways to approved courses the new curricular model.

Remember October 1 is a hard deadline for departments to submit courses to Course Consent.

Please keep in mind the GECC, URCC, and the SCCC are trying to be as supportive as possible through this process. If you have concerns or specific issues that need to be addressed, please contact your college curriculum representative, GE area representative or UR facilitator. I can also help guide you to the appropriate person, if needed.

Lastly, as we move into the part of the year where the hours of darkness outnumber the hours of daylight, please be kind to each other. Especially our staff colleagues who have the massive job of executing and coding all the curricular changes we are making.

Take care,

Michael

Curricular Planning Update, September 13, 2018

The GE and UR Interim Learning Outcomes and Criteria Master has been updated. The details of this particular update are further below. This master document is designed to be comprehensive. It contains or provides access to any information or materials a faculty member needs to submit a course seeking to meet a GE or University Requirement. Such information or materials include outcomes and criteria, proposal forms, and the names of people who can support course developers. The document is organized (mostly) by requirement with links to the requirement sections in the table to contents.
Below is a list of the updates to the master document since last week:
  • Except for Upper Division Service Learning, all GE and University Requirement Outcomes and Criteria have been posted. Interim outcomes for Upper Division Service are forthcoming.
  • Except for GE Area C, links are now included to all course proposal forms. The proposal forms for GE Area C should be available on Friday, 9/14.
  • The names of all GE area representatives and UR facilitators are in located in their respective requirement section.
Please keep in mind that Departments, Schools and Divisions must submit courses to Course Consent by October 1. If you have any questions or concerns, please don’t hesitate to contact the appropriate representative or facilitator. I can also provide assistance if you’re not sure who to talk to.
Thanks,
Michael

News from the September ASCSU Plenary

Good news on the approved budget.
The final budget for the CSU included a $197.3 Million increase for the General Fund (CSU operations) and $120 million in one-time funds. Thanks to everyone who reached out to their representatives to encourage the Legislature to prioritize the CSU and increase the amount initially proposed by the Governor! Summary details can be found on p. 33-34 of the of the Legislative Budget Conference Committee Close-Out Agenda.

The Chancellor also noted two additional budget-related matters:

  1. $25 million this year was distributed to the campuses as increased support for tenure-track hiring.
  2. For the coming year, the Board of Trustees will likely ask for a $400 million increase (double the normal ask) to support increased enrollment growth and maintenance of facilities, among other needs.

New recruitment software coming
The CSU will be rolling out new system-wide software, CHRS Recruiting, to be used by hiring committees and administrative staff. The first five campuses to implement will be  Fullerton San Bernardino, San Diego, Stanislaus, San Luis Obispo. One feature of the software will be real-time diversity profiles of the candidate pool so hiring committees will have the information they need to consider the broader demographics of the applicants. See SJSU page for more details.

Recognizing CSU Centers for Community Engagement and Student Success in Service Learning and Community Engagement – *first read*
The Senate was presented with the first read of the Resolution Observing the 20th Anniversary of the CSU Centers for Community Engagement and Student Success in Service Learning and Community Engagement. This is a quite brief resolutions and the key elements are that the ASCSU encourages both the Chancellor, Board of Trustees, every campus Senate and campus President to “plan for and carry out an appropriate observation of the 20th anniversary of the CSU Center for Community Engagement.”
     If you have questions, feedback, or comments on the resolution, please be in contact with Vanessa or Scott.

Addressing shared governance
In November, the Senate will be addressing the Tenets of System Level Governance in the California State University. This document is the outcome of intensive discussions  between the ASCSU Executive team and the Chancellor’s Office and it outlines baseline tenets regarding how shared governance between the ASCSU and the Chancellor’s Offices should occur. These discussions and the resulting Tenets document represent ASCSU’s effort to call the Chancellor’s Office to account for breakdown in appropriate consultation around implementation of EO1100/1110.
     In November, the Tenets documents comes to the floor for action. Since the Tenets documents itself represents an agreed-upon commitment by both the ASCSU Executive team and the Chancellor’s Office, it is unlikely the Tenets document itself will be modified. However, it is likely that the Tenets will be accompanied by a resolution, which can provide further commentary on behalf of the Senate.
     If you have questions, feedback, or comments on the resolution, please be in contact with Vanessa or Scott.

For a more detailed outline of the Plenary business, see document here by Senators Tarjan and Millar.